Home Aims & Objectives Restoration Options Breeding Waders Creating Wetlands Farming Partnerships News Page Wetlands to Visit Contact Us Links
 

 

< Next Page >

A BTO Research Report No. 329

Breeding Wader Populations in the Severn & Avon Vales Natural Area in 2002

(EXTRACT)

Authors
Andy Wilson and Mike Smart


Report of work carried out by The British Trust for Ornithology under contract to the
Environment Agency and English Nature


June 2003


© British Trust for Ornithology

British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU
Registered Charity No. 216652

 
 


Summary

  • A total of 72 sites were surveyed for breeding waders in the Severn and Avon Vales Natural Area in 2002.
  • 196 pairs of waders were located: 109 pairs of Lapwings, 45 pairs of Redshank, 34 pairs of Curlew, seven pairs of Oystercatchers and one pair of Snipe.Counts were compared with a previous survey. Wader population changes between 1982 and 2002 were in line with those elsewhere, as indicated by the national Breeding Waders of Wet Meadows surveys in those years. Comparison with a RSPB survey from 1995 indicate that the declines have not halted during the last seven years; Redshank in particular is rapidly decreasing in the Severn Vale, and away from the estuary is now found almost exclusively on artificial gravel pit-type sites.Densities of Lapwing and Redshank are only one-third of the average found on wet lowland grassland in England and Wales in 2002, Curlew densities in the Severn and Avon Vales were higher then the national average.Oystercatchers have colonised the Severn Vale within the last 10 years but remain scarce.The only site in the Severn or Avon Vales that attracts drumming Snipe annually is Ashleworth Ham.Efforts to stop and reverse these declines should initially concentrate on safe guarding existing wader populations, through conservation measures at near-natural sites such as the Great Hay Meadow, Coombe Hill, the Chelt/Leigh Meadows, Gooseham and Aysham, and Eckington Marshes. Particular attention should be devoted to the Carrant Catchment, hitherto neglected.Observations in 2002 indicate that Curlew young could be vulnerable to hay cutting well into July, delaying cutting would be beneficial to this species.
  • Long-term strategies for wetland recreation in the Severn or Avon Vales should be strongly influenced by the habitat requirements of breeding waders. It should be noted that an element of arable land is important in providing nest sites for Lapwings.

 


1. INTRODUCTION

Land use changes in river floodplains have come under increasing scrutiny in Great Britain, and in lowland England in particular, in recent years. An increased prevalence in the flooding of built-up areas coupled with a loss of biodiversity along river flood plains have prompted debate about the way in which our floodplains are managed.

Loss of biodiversity on floodplain grassland has been widely reported and ties in with a general loss of biodiversity on farmland across the UK, widely attributed to increased agricultural intensification. Changes in grassland management have been especially pronounced since the mid 1970s, with drainage, re-seeding of permanent pasture, increased use of fertilisers, conversion to arable and changes in stocking regimes all known to have adverse effects on wildlife. Of the bird species found in these habitats, it is the waders that are widely perceived to have been most affected. Substantial proportions of the breeding populations of Lapwing Vanellus vanellus, Redshank Tringa totanus, and Snipe Gallinago gallinago in particular have traditionally been found on wet grassland sites; the reduction or loss of these grassland populations have therefore contributed to local extinctions across some parts of lowland England and Wales.

The changes in floodplain use and management of the Severn and Avon Valleys have reflected those witnessed across lowland Britain. The adverse effects on the Severn catchment’s breeding wader populations have been pronounced. During a national survey of breeding waders on wet grasslands carried out by the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) in 1982 (Smith 1983) it was found that most areas in the Severn Valley held very few breeding waders. A more extensive survey by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) in 1995 revealed that wader numbers had dwindled still further (Quinn 1995).

A comprehensive appraisal of options for the re-creation of River Severn/Avon floodplain wetlands was carried out on behalf of the Environment Agency, English Nature and RSPB in 1999. This report (henceforth referred to as Ecoscope) gave detailed information on the history of drainage and land management within the Severn and Avon Vales Natural Area and identified 18 areas (Ecoscope Zones) for potential wetland recreation (Table 1.1). Sites were assessed for their suitability for re-creation of floodplain wetlands based on criteria such as constraining factors (e.g. housing, transport infrastructure, archaeological features, flood defence considerations), habitat requirements (e.g. soil type, water supply, existing habitat) and their suitability for target species groups.

Table 1.1 Ecoscope Zones (from Ecoscope 1999)
Ecoscope Zone
Grid reference
Overall suitability
1. Severn :Worcester to Holt
SO836575-SO827632
Moderate
2. Teme & Severn confluence
SO8451
Moderate/High
3. Severn : Kempsey Upper & Lower Hams
SO849498-SO845485
Moderate
4. Severn :Clifton to Upton on Severn
SO846502- SO885410
Low
5. Birch Green
SO885445
Moderate
6. Severn : Upper & Lower Hams, Upton
SO8539
Moderate
7. Severn : Uckinghall to Tewkesbury
SO8638-SO8833
High/Moderate
8. Longdon Marsh
SO8235
High
9. Severn :Tewkesbury to Longford
SO8731-SO8321
High
10. Severn : Coombe Hill
SO8727
High/Moderate
11. Severn : Minsterworth Ham
SO8016
Moderate
12. Severn : Elmore Back to Longney
SO7716-SO7513
Moderate/Low
13. Severn : Walmore Common
SO7415
Moderate
14. Severn : Awre
SO7108
High
15. Wicksters Brook/The Moors, Slimbridge
SO7405 and SO7203
Moderate
16. Avon : Evesham to Birlingham
SP032448-SP940437
Moderate/Low
17: Avon : Eckington Bridge to Tewkesbury
SP923424-SO8933
Moderate
18: Avon : Bidford to Offenham
SP0951-SP0546
Moderate

A second national Breeding Waders of Wet Meadows was planned by BTO on behalf of the RSPB in 2001. It was thought worthwhile achieving an extensive survey of the Severn and Avon Vales again in 2001 in the light of the Ecoscope report. This survey was postponed in 2001 due to the Foot & Mouth outbreak but went ahead in the spring of 2002.

This report presents the findings of the 2002 wader survey in the Severn & Avon Vales (henceforth called BTO02). The results for each site are presented and comparative figures for areas surveyed in 1982 and 1995 (henceforth called BTO82 and RSPB95 respectively) are given to provide evidence of changes in wader numbers over the last 20 years. Maps of the distribution of 2002 and 1995 survey sites can be found in Appendices 4 and 5 respectively, along with a map of Ecoscope Zones in Appendix 6.


2. METHODS

Site Selection

The aim was to cover all suitable wet meadow sites within the Severn and Avon Vales in 2002. This was to be done by a combination of volunteer BTO surveyors and a professional surveyor. Priorities for coverage were the Ecoscope Zones and the sites for which previous survey data was available (BTO82 or RSPB95). Due to the complex nature of overlaying results from three sets of site boundaries (BTO82, RSPB95 and Ecoscope Zones), some sites were merged or split to ease survey coverage. Sites covered along the River Leadon were not included in the survey as these were not covered in the original BTO survey and only a single pair of breeding waders (Lapwings) was found in RSPB95. The Carrant catchment, not covered in previous surveys, was covered in BTO02, as were some recently created gravel pits. The final list of sites to be covered comprised over 70 areas of varying size, totalling around 120 square kilometres.


Field Surveys

The methodology followed that from previous surveys (Smith 1983) with three visits to each site between mid April and late June. This spread of visits ensures that at least one visit coincides with the peak activity of each species. The survey method is the “field by field approach”, whereby the observer walks across the site, aiming to walk within 100 metres of the whole area, mapping the locations of waders on large-scale maps. A set of survey instructions can be found in Appendix 12.

Analytical Methods


Wader numbers for each site were estimated using established protocols (O’Brien & Smith 1992; Gilbert et al. 1998) for each species (Table 2.1).

Table 2.1 Methods for estimating number of pairs for each wader species
Species
Method
Oystercatcher Half the maximum number of individuals recorded between mid April & late May
Lapwing Half the maximum number of individuals recorded between mid April & late May
Redshank The mean number of individuals recorded between mid April & late May
Curlew Maximum number of pairs or territorial birds seen
Snipe Number of drumming or chipping birds

In some cases (e.g. pairs of Redshanks at Saul Warth or Twyning Green) these protocols produced population estimates that were considered to be optimistic by the observers concerned but using these established methods does allow direct comparability with previous surveys.

Each of the site boundaries from the BTO82, RSPB95, BTO02 surveys and the Ecoscope study were digitised so that the data could be analysed using ArcView Geographic Information System (Environment Systems Research Institute 1996). This approach ensured that comparisons of wader counts between surveys referred only to those areas of each site that were covered in both surveys.


3. RESULTS

3.1 Survey Coverage

Seventy-two sites were surveyed (Table 3.1), including all those likely to support breeding waders. The total area covered was 11,868 hectares, considerably more than in BTO82 and RSPB95 (6446 hectares in the Severn and Avon Vales). Most of the sites covered in BTO82 were re-surveyed, giving a sample of 27 sites covering 4653 hectares from which to make paired comparisons while 53 of the RSPB95 sites were covered, totalling 6295 hectares.

Table 3.1 Pairs of breeding waders at 2002 survey sites 
BTO Site number
Site name
Grid-ref
Area (ha)
Oystercatcher
Lapwing
Snipe
Curlew
Redshank
2510
Frampton Marsh
SO745055
99
0
1
0
0
0
2511
Elmore Back
S0770165
55
0
0
0
0
0
2542
Corn Ham
SO798155
149
0
0
0
0
0
2544
Port Ham
SO820190
75
0
0
0
0
0
2547
Maisemore Ham
SO820206
105
0
0
0
0
0
2548
Sandhurst-Maisemore Park
SO820225
41
0
1
0
0
0
2549
Ashleworth & Hasfield Hams
SO830265
67
0
1
1
1
2
2559
Parkend Bridge
SO782116
40
0
0
0
0
0
3204
Ryalls Court Farm
SO850420
128
0
0
0
0
0
3205
Severn Stoke Farm
SO854435
100
0
1
0
0
0
3206
Clifton-Severn Stoke
SO843452
94
0
0
0
0
0
3207
Clifton-Baynall
SO840465
123
0
0
0
0
0
3209
Kempsey Lower Ham
SO845484
29
0
0
0
0
0
3210
Clerkenleap-Kempsey
SO849501
36
0
0
0
0
0
3215
Barbourne-Holt Fleet
SO842600
322
0
1
0
0
0
3224
Teme (Bransford Bridge)
SO805535
18
0
0
0
0
0
3251
Twyning Green-Strensham
SO915375
331
0
2
0
5
8
3252
Eckington Marshes
SO911417
239
0
3
0
4
0
3253
Gooseham and Aysham
SO925425
31
0
0
0
2
0
3254
Pershore-Fladbury
SO975460
856
0
8
0
1
0
9052
Confluence - Leigh Sinton
SO830530
346
0
1
0
0
0
9631
Aylburton Warth
SO615000
76
0
11
0
0
3
9632
New Grounds Slimbridge
SO725052
535
5
12
0
0
7
9634
Sud Meadow
SO810185
40
0
0
0
0
0
9636
Severn Ham
SO885325
69
0
0
0
1
1
10001
Saul Warth
SO740077
80
0
8
0
0
13
10263
Powick Meadows and Powick Hams
SO830524
477
0
1
0
1
0
10264
Kempsey
SO847482
49
0
0
0
0
0
10265
Hanley Castle
SO850430
63
0
0
0
0
0
10266
Ashmoor Common
SO854464
41
0
0
0
0
0
10267
Upton Hams
SO860390
216
0
0
0
2
0
10268
Uckinghall Meadow
SO864379
119
0
0
0
0
0
10269
Bushley Meadows
SO872350
178
0
0
0
1
0
10270
Mythe Pool
SO880352
111
0
0
0
0
0
10271
Bow Farm/Ripple Lake
SO873364
109
0
3
0
0
0
10272
Longdon Marsh
SO820360
636
0
8
0
1
0
10273
Hasfield Ham & Ashleworth Meadows
SO840260
387
0
2
0
2
0
10274
Chaceley/Tirley
SO850295
368
0
1
0
2
0
10275
Lower Lode
SO879322
36
0
0
0
0
0
10276
Sandhurst - Brawn Farm
SO820243
79
0
0
0
0
0
10277
Sandhurst - Longford
SO825212
188
0
4
0
0
0
10278
Inchmore Bridge-Fletcher's Leap
SO860254
171
0
5
0
2
0
10279
Long Pool, Deerhurst
SO875272
87
0
0
0
0
0
10280
Apperleyhall Farm
SO860270
92
0
0
0
1
0
10281
Cobney Meadows - Vine Tree Farm
SO870268
192
0
2
0
2
0
10282
Minsterworth Ham
SO800174
341
0
0
0
0
0
10283
Elmore-Back - Weir Green
SO783160
197
0
1
0
0
0
10284
Bridgemacote
SO760157
174
0
0
0
0
0
10285
Longney
SO759134
243
0
0
0
0
0
10287
Hayward
SO715085
151
0
0
0
0
0
10286
Walmore Common
SO740155
50
0
1
0
0
0
10289
Cambridge
SO747040
190
0
0
0
0
0
10290
Lower Lode
SO865305
123
0
0
0
1
0
10291
Avon, Pensham
SO934443
139
0
0
0
0
0
10292
Avon, Twyning
SO900355
105
0
1
0
1
0
10293
Avon, Bredons Hardwick
SO904352
302
1
1
0
3
2
10294
Avon, Bidford-Offenham
SP070493
484
0
13
0
0
2
10302
Bray's Farm Meadow
SO790360
72
0
0
0
0
0
10303
Brotheridge Green
SO825418
96
0
0
0
0
0
10304
Castlemorton Common
SO780390
116
0
0
0
0
0
10305
Coombegreen Common
SO775365
55
0
0
0
0
0
10306
Epney
SO775115
120
0
2
0
0
0
10307
Forthhampton
SO885317
64
0
0
0
0
0
10308
Hollybed Common
SO770378
42
0
0
0
0
0
10310
Longdon Brook
SO860365
150
0
0
0
1
0
10312
River Swillgate
SO905290
185
0
0
0
0
0
10313
Woodfield Farm
SO950425
124
0
7
0
0
7
10367
Aylburton, New Grounds
SO635010
128
1
8
0
0
0
10369
Avon, Evesham-Fladbury
SP010470
154
0
0
0
0
0
Wet Meadows Total
11498
7
110
1
34
45
Additional sites (not wet meadows)
Grimley Gravel Pits
SO832597
c.55
1
3
0
0
1
Clifton Gravel Pits
SO845445
c.50
0
1
0
0
0